Tomato, tom-ah-to. Potato, po-tah-to, Google Display Network, programmatic ad buying. It’s all pretty much the same, right?
Not quite! It’s a common misconception that these two platforms are interchangable. While they both work toward the shared goal of getting your message in front of a targeted audience, each has its pros and cons.
When choosing a platform for your digital ads, it helps to be aware of the key differences between each option and how they can help or harm your campaigns. Here’s what you need to know when it comes to Google Display Network vs. programmatic advertising.
In this platform, marketers bid on their preferred ads spaces, all of which auto-optimize over time for better results. We say “preferred” because while the network involves over 2 million websites, you don’t necessarily want your ad to appear on all of them. You can select different website tiers, blacklist certain sites and be conscientious of where your ads are popping up.
The GDN is a great choice because it integrates visually rich ads throughout the user’s regular web experience rather than just displaying easily overlooked text.
Image ads containing text and image, similar to the Google Display Network above.
Audio ads that appear in podcasts, internet radio and music streaming platforms like Spotify.
Video ads which can appear as native ads blended throughout a webpage or in-stream within certain video players. Note that they cannot be placed on YouTube as it is strictly part of the Google Display Network.
Programmatic ad buying is not a free or open platform. To access programmatic ad buying, you must tap into the SaaS (software as a service) industry. We suggest going directly to an agency that has the necessary software for programmatic ad buying through an existing partnership with platforms like Centro, TheTradeDesk, Simpli.fi, or StackAdapt.
Concept: Both the GDN and programmatic advertising are auction-based bidding platforms that utilize display advertising to reach a targeted audience.
Placement: With both options, marketers are able to reach mobile applications and domain placements.
Targeting: At their core, both platforms have shared basic targeting options. Users are able to target a specified audience based on demographics, behaviors, interests, site topics and remarketing.
With a basic explanation of each platform and knowing what they have in common, you may be thinking “Hey, aren’t these the exact same thing?”
Not quite! Despite their similarities, the GDN and programmatic advertising are vastly different and each one has its pros and cons. Stick with us and we’ll help you decide which option is right for you.
There are many other platforms within the umbrella of programmatic advertising that reach their own unique subsets of the internet, like Google.
The Google Display Network is an excellent choice for beginners and marketers who want to keep it simple.
It’s easy to use and doesn’t have a huge cost barrier. There are fees to access the GDN platform and minimum bids you must make on your ads to grab space in the automated auctions. Overall cost is manageable, making it a great option for marketers on a budget.
The GDN also directly integrates with the Google Product Suite. If your business is steeped in Google Drive, Gmail and Google Calendar, you can use your existing Google account to access GDN and better track your ads with tools like Sheets.
Additionally, with GDN you can target users based on their Google search history and interest. This data is not directly accessible by programmatic ad buying software and may require an added CPM cost.
Before you start immediately sending cash to Google via carrier pigeon, remember the platform does have its share of disadvantages, too.
The GDN does not have access to many premium private marketplace (PMP) deals that programmatic ad buying software companies make with certain sites. While it does encompass 2 million sites, keep in mind the internet has 200 million active websites currently running.
There are also restrictions on your ad formats. With GDN, you’re better off sticking with image ads. Video ads can only run on YouTube and you can only run audio or TV-based ads through YouTube apps.
Lamenting GDN’s inability to get your video ad to reach the masses? Then programmatic advertising might be your cup of tea!
The broader concept of programmatic advertising has an increased distribution and scale, reaching over 20 ad exchanges. In contrast, the GDN is just one ad exchange. This means more available inventory and space for your ads to show. It also allows for use of creative formatting options not available with GDN like audio ads, connected TV and native video.
With programmatic, you have increased control over audience targeting, creative placement and retargeting options. For example, you have the option to use multiple creative types to run retargeting ads based on user completion percentages for your audio and video ads. If a user watches or listens to more than 50% of your ad, you can show them another video. But if they listen to only 25% you can show a different image instead.
In a similar vein, programmatic ads come with integrations allowing for advanced targeting options like location-based advertising, behavioral advertising and in-store attribution. With in-store attribution, the audience can receive ads after visiting a store’s physical location, known through mobile device tracking. These options go above and beyond GDN’s available targeting methods.
Unlike GDN, other dedicated programmatic advertising platforms also give you access to private marketplace (PMP) deals and premium inventory spots that software partners have reached or purchased on their own.
Programmatic advertising is like that song from Aladdin - a whole new world of automated ad buying! But its biggest disadvantage is that it comes at a cost.
It’s generally a little more expensive to enter the world of programmatic advertising space due to platform costs. These costs can be offset by working with a vendor or agency who already has the platform, leading to a lower financial barrier to entry.
Another disadvantage is that the CPM (cost per thousand impressions) model means that you pay for impressions and not engagement. That said, platforms evolve all of the time, and are constatnly innovating on pricing models. Platforms like StackAdapt leverage machine learning and can offer CPE (Cost per Engagement) models too.
The true difficulty of programmatic advertising is the need to become an expert to find success. While these platforms are made more accessible and easier to learn with each passing year, there’s a much wider learning gap when it comes to programmatic advertising in contrast to Google’s user-friendly setup.
Despite the cost and learning gap, programmatic advertising is always the best option if your budget allows for it. It gives you increased control, a wider scale and better targeting capabilities.
But this doesn’t mean the GDN is a “bad” choice. Especially if your budget is limited, Google’s Display Network is an excellent alternative with a lower cost of entry.
Whichever option you choose, the most important thing is that you have a clear message, great imagery or video content and a strong strategy behind your advertising efforts.
Anthony is a Senior Manager on the Performance Marketing team. Ask him about paid search, programmatic advertising, even SEO if you'd like. When you're inevitably satisfied with his response, be ready to turn the conversation to classic movies and music from the 70s.
Reach out to learn more about how thunder::tech can help your business not only succeed, but accelerate.